Littledog

United States v. Littledog

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 5, 202625-1103California553 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 5 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-1103 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:24-cr-00002-BMM-1 v. MEMORANDUM*

NOBLEE ROSE LITTLEDOG,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Brian M. Morris, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 3, 2026** Portland, Oregon

Before: CHRISTEN, HURWITZ, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Noblee Littledog (“Littledog”) appeals her conviction after a bench trial for

assault resulting in serious bodily injury under 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(6). The

government alleged that Littledog drove recklessly on the Blackfeet Indian

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Reservation in Browning, Montana, which caused a car accident and serious…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.