Qiao
Qiao v. Chang CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Following a court trial on Plaintiff’s action, judgment was entered on February 23,
2024, in favor of Respondents, and they moved for costs and attorney fees. (Qiao v.
Chang, et al. E083864) On July 12, 2024, Judge Lydia Villarreal awarded $45,353.01 in
costs to Respondents. On August 21, 2024, Judge Carol A. Greene entered a minute
order awarding $552,940 in attorney fees to Respondents; notice of entry of the costs and
fees award orders was served on August 23, 2024. Subsequently, Judge Greene vacated
the award of attorney fees and placed the matter back on calendar. Following a new
hearing, Judge John Molloy awarded Respondents $552,940 in attorney fees. Plaintiff
appealed.
II. DISCUSSION
“‘“‘On review of an award of attorney fees . . . the normal standard of review is
abuse of discretion. However, de novo review of such a trial court order is warranted
2 where the determination of whether the criteria for an award of attorney fees . . . have
been satisfied amounts to statutory construction and a question of law.’” [Citations.]’
[Citation.]” (Artus v. Gramercy Towers Condominium Assn. (2022) 76 Cal.App.5th 1043,