Jesus Flores v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20261:25-cv-01001California452 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESUS FLORES, Case No. 1:25-cv-01001-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS

v. SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR

FAILURE TO FILE OPENING BRIEF

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

SEVEN-DAY DEADLINE

Defendant.

15 On August 12, 2025, Plaintiff filed this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying an application for disability benefits pursuant to the Social Security Act. (ECF No. 1.) On August 13, 2025, the Court issued a scheduling order. (ECF No. 5.) Pursuant to the scheduling order, Plaintiff’s opening brief was due 30 days after the filing of the administrative record. (Id. at 2.) The administrative record was lodged on December 9, 2025 (ECF No. 13), and thus, Plaintiff’s opening brief was due by January 8, 2026. However, neither an opening brief nor request for extension of time has been submitted. Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.