Zhumi-Chilpe
Zhumi-Chilpe v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 6, 202624-7175California555 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 6 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
YOHNNORYS CECIBEL ZHUMI- No. 24-7175 CHILPE; DAIRA ALIN ACOSTA- Agency Nos.
ZHUMI; NOA NAIRA ACOSTA-ZHUMI, A246-533-415
A246-533-416
Petitioners,
A246-533-417
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 4, 2026** Portland, Oregon
Before: BEA, CHRISTEN, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
Petitioners Yohnnorys Cecibel Zhumi-Chilpe and her two minor children
petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of their
motion to reopen on the ground that they did not receive the BIA’s decision and thus
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). did not receive proper notice to file a timely petition for review.…