Edgar Cruz-Nolasco v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 6, 202620-73250California536 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 6 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDGAR BENJAMIN CRUZ-NOLASCO, No. 20-73250

DANIELA ASTRID CRUZ-RIVERA

Agency Nos. Petitioner, A208-291-768;

A208-291-769

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 4, 2026** Portland, Oregon

Before: BEA, CHRISTEN, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Edgar Cruz-Nolasco (“Cruz-Nolasco”) and his daughter (collectively,

“petitioners”) petition for review of an order by the Board of Immigration Appeals

(“BIA”) dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of their claims

for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Torture.1 We have jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.