Edgar Cruz-Nolasco v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 6, 202620-73250California536 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 6 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
EDGAR BENJAMIN CRUZ-NOLASCO, No. 20-73250
DANIELA ASTRID CRUZ-RIVERA
Agency Nos. Petitioner, A208-291-768;
A208-291-769
v.
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 4, 2026** Portland, Oregon
Before: BEA, CHRISTEN, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
Edgar Cruz-Nolasco (“Cruz-Nolasco”) and his daughter (collectively,
“petitioners”) petition for review of an order by the Board of Immigration Appeals
(“BIA”) dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of their claims
for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Torture.1 We have jurisdiction…