Bluemar Promotions, LLC v. Vonnic, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 6, 202624-7221California807 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 6 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BLUEMAR PROMOTIONS, LLC, No. 24-7221 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:22-cv-06045-MWF-SK v. MEMORANDUM*

VONNIC, INC.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 4, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER, BRESS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Vonnic, Inc. appeals an award of damages to Bluemar Promotions, LLC,

based on Bluemar’s breach of contract and warranty claims concerning counterfeit

KN95 masks that Vonnic sold to Bluemar. The district court granted partial summary

judgment to Bluemar, ruling that Vonnic had breached its contractual obligations.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.