Cohen

Cohen v. Snyder CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 2026B333194California4,142 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hanasono, J.

Filed 2/6/26 Cohen v. Snyder CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

LES COHEN, B333194

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20STCV33348) v.

STEPHEN SNYDER,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Lia Martin, Judge. Affirmed. Stephen Snyder, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant. Krause-Leemon Cohen & Daneshrad and David R. Krause- Leemon, for Plaintiff and Respondent. ‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ Defendant Stephen Snyder appeals from a default judgment entered in Les Cohen’s lawsuit against him. We affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Cohen sued Snyder in September 2020. Cohen filed a proof of service of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.