Sandhu

Jaswinder Pal Singh Sandhu v. FMCSA, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20261:25-cv-01625California1,786 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASWINDER PAL SINGH SANDHU, Case No. 1:25-cv-01625-KES-CDB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF

v. SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AND

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

FMCSA, et al., (Doc. 4) Defendants. 21-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Plaintiff Jaswinder Pal Singh Sandhu (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this action with the filing of a complaint on November 24, 2025. (Doc. 1). On November 26, 2025, the Court issued the first screening order, finding that Plaintiff failed to establish the Court’s subject matter jurisdiction and failed to state any cognizable claims, and granted leave to amend. (Doc. 3). Plaintiff’s first amended complaint was docketed on January 5, 2026; it is signed and dated December 16, 2025. (Doc. 4). The undersigned issues the following findings and recommendations below. I. Plaintiff’s Allegations In the first amended complaint, Plaintiff names…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.