Eunji Jeong v. John or Jane Doe, and Does 2-10, inclusive

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20268:25-cv-02024California1,245 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EUNJI JEONG, Case No. 8:25-cv-02024-KES

Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING CASE

v. FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

JOHN or JANE DOE, and DOES 2-10,

inclusive, Defendants.

I.

INTRODUCTION

Eunji Jeong (“Plaintiff”) is a Korean social media influencer with a

“substantial” following. (Dkt. 1 at 2.) On September 8, 2025, Plaintiff filed a Complaint alleging that the unknown defendant or defendants (“Doe”) stalked Plaintiff in violation of federal and state statutes, recorded confidential communications in violation of the California Privacy Act justifying treble damages, and engaged in a pattern of harassment directed towards Plaintiff. (See generally id.) The Court issued the Summons on September 17, 2025. (Dkt. 6.) On September 18, 2025, Plaintiff moved the Court for leave to serve a third party subpoena on Meta Platforms, Inc. to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.