Grisso

Maximus Grisso v. Frank Bisignano, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20263:24-cv-08140California1,528 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MAXIMUS GRISSO, Case No. 24-cv-08140-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v.

10 FRANK BISIGNANO,1 et al., Defendants.

Plaintiff Maximus Grisso challenges a decision by a Social Security Administration (SSA) administrative law judge (ALJ) that denied his application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. See Dkt. No. 1. Grisso filed a motion for summary judgment, Dkt. No. 16, which the parties briefed, Dkt. Nos. 21, 22. Summary judgment is granted in favor of Grisso, and the case is remanded to the SSA for further proceedings consistent with this order. BACKGROUND Grisso applied for Title II benefits on April 25, 2020. Administrative Record, Dkt. No. 13 (AR), at 17. The SSA denied Grisso’s application on June 29, 2022, and denied reconsideration on November 14, 2022. AR127-31, 132-39. The ALJ held a hearing on October 23, 2023, and heard testimony from Grisso, who was represented by an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.