Chestnut

Chilber Pedrozo Munoz v. Christopher Chestnut, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20261:25-cv-01908California402 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

EURniItCed G SRtaAteNs TA ttorney CHARLES CAMPBELL Assistant United States Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2700 Facsimile: (916) 554-2900

Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHILBER PEDROZO MUNOZ, CASE NO. 1:25-CV-1908-DC-EFB

11 Petitioner, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING BRIEFING ON HABEAS CORPUS v. PETITION 13 CHRISTOPHER CHESTNUT, et al., 14 Respondents.

16 Petitioner Chilber Pedrozo Munoz, by and through his counsel of record, Emilio T. Parker, and Respondents, by and through their counsel Eric Grant, United States Attorney, and Charles Campbell, Assistant United States Attorney, stipulate as follows: 1. On December 17, 2025, Petitioner filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and a Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order. Dkt. Nos. 2, 3. 2. On December 22, 2025, Respondents filed their opposition to the above filings. Dkt. No. 8. 3. On December 22, 2025, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.