Yan

Weiqing Yan v. Ruslan Vdovicenco, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20263:25-cv-09993California2,963 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 WEIQING YAN, Case No. 25-cv-09993-LJC Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. REMAND; GRANTING IN PART

REQUEST FOR FEES

RUSLAN VDOVICENCO, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 4 Defendants. 11 Before the Court is Plaintiff Weiqing Yan’s Motion to Remand this matter to Alameda County Superior Court and request for attorney’s fees against Defendant Ruslan Vdovicenco. ECF No. 4. This matter is suitable for resolution without oral argument and the hearing set for January 27, 2026 is hereby VACATED. See Civil L. R. 7-1(b). Having considered the record in this case, the arguments presented by the parties, and the relevant legal authorities, Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand is GRANTED. Her request for attorney's fees is GRANTED in part. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed an unlawful detainer action against Defendants Equaan Smith and Russell Robinson in Alameda County Superior Court to evict them from 6646 Saroni Drive, Oakland, California (the Property). See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.