Peterson
United States v. Peterson
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 9 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-1090 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 6:22-cr-00097-MC-1 v.
MEMORANDUM*
JEREMY LEE PETERSON, AKA Jeremy L. Peterson,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael J. McShane, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 5, 2026** Portland, Oregon
Before: BEA, CHRISTEN, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
Defendant-Appellant Jeremy Lee Peterson appeals the district court’s order
of restitution imposed after he pleaded guilty to one count of production of child
pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a) and (e) and was sentenced to a
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 360-month term of imprisonment. Because the parties are familiar with the facts,
we do not…