Peterson

United States v. Peterson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 9, 202625-1090California645 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 9 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-1090 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 6:22-cr-00097-MC-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

JEREMY LEE PETERSON, AKA Jeremy L. Peterson,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael J. McShane, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 5, 2026** Portland, Oregon

Before: BEA, CHRISTEN, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Defendant-Appellant Jeremy Lee Peterson appeals the district court’s order

of restitution imposed after he pleaded guilty to one count of production of child

pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a) and (e) and was sentenced to a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 360-month term of imprisonment. Because the parties are familiar with the facts,

we do not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.