Shillington

Shillington v. Bisignano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 9, 202624-6894California1,237 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 9 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MATTHEW J. SHILLINGTON, No. 24-6894 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:23-cv-05888-GJL v.

MEMORANDUM*

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Grady J. Leupold, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 5, 2026** Portland, Oregon

Before: BEA, CHRISTEN, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Matthew Shillington (“Shillington”) appeals the district

court order which affirmed the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) denial of his

application for Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits under Title II of the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.