Roberto Fernandez-Martinez v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 9, 202621-70963California663 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 9 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERTO CARLOS FERNANDEZ- No. 21-70963

MARTINEZ,

Agency No. A206-453-571 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 5, 2026** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: BERZON, CALLAHAN, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Roberto Carlos Fernandez-Martinez, a native and citizen of

Mexico, seeks review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

affirming the denial by an immigration judge (“IJ”) of his applications for

cancellation of removal and for voluntary departure. We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1252. We deny in part and dismiss in part the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.