Diego Francisco-Diego v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 9, 202618-70182California1,179 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 9 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DIEGO ANTONIO FRANCISCO-DIEGO, No. 18-70182 AKA Diego Antonio, AKA Diego Antonio Francisco, AKA Francisco Gutierrez, AKA Agency No. A206-676-996 Francisco Gutierrez Mateo,

Petitioner, MEMORANDUM*

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 5, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: LEE, KOH, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Diego Antonio Francisco-Diego (“Petitioner”), a native and

citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of a decision by the Board of

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing the appeal of an Immigration Judge’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“IJ”) denial of Petitioner’s requests for asylum, withholding of removal,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.