Deheng Xu v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 9, 202618-70103California743 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 9 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DEHENG XU, No. 18-70103

Petitioner, Agency No. A201-048-067

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 5, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER, BRESS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Deheng Xu, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of a Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision dismissing his appeal of an immigration

judge’s (IJ) order denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).1 We review the agency’s

factual findings, including adverse credibility determinations, for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.