Villagrana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AMBROSIO VILLAGRANA, Case No. 22-cv-02618-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER COMPELLING FURTHER

v. INTERROGATORY RESPONSES

BEVERLY BAILEY, et al., Re: ECF No. 103 Defendant.

12 In this action, Plaintiff Ambrosio Villagrana alleges that he was injured due to the Defendant Stronghold Engineering’s negligence in executing a certain construction project (“the Project”). See ECF No. 89. Before the Court is the parties’ joint discovery letter brief. ECF No. 103. This discovery dispute arises from Defendant’s responses to Interrogatories Nos. 1 and 2. Id. at 1. Plaintiff argues that those responses were incomplete and seeks to compel Defendant to provide complete responses. Id. The Court agrees with Plaintiff that Interrogatories Nos. 1 and 2 seek information directly relevant to the claims and defenses in this matter and are within the proper scope of discovery pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26. Interrogatory No. 1 asks for an…