Tangle Inc. v. Aritzia LP, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TANGLE INC., Case No. 23-cv-01196-JSW Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
Vv. LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
ARITZIA LP, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 103 Defendants. 11 a
Now before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration of
v the Court’s Order dated October 3, 2025, dismissing Aritzia Inc. for lack of personal jurisdiction. © || After reviewing the filing, opposition, and supplementary materials, the Court finds that there is © 16 |] not newly discovered evidence or grounds for reconsideration. Evidence of macromanagement
= || does not equate to direction of day-to-day operations or a disregard for separate corporate
Zz formalities. See, e.g., Ranza v. Nike, Inc., 793 F.3d 1059, 1075 (9th Cir. 2015). The Court || DENIES Plaintiffs motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration. IT IS SO ORDERED. fo) Dated: January…