Meksida Mnatsakanyan v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202615-73232California600 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MEKSIDA MNATSAKANYAN, No. 15-73232

Petitioner, Agency No. A078-539-208

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 6, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER, BRESS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Meksida Mnatsakanyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for

review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her

second motion to reopen proceedings. The BIA determined that the motion was

untimely and numerically barred, see 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(A)–(C)(i), and that

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Mnatsakanyan had not met her burden of showing materially changed country

conditions, see id. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.