Osman Mendoza v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202620-72426California1,086 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OSMAN ENRIQUE MENDOZA, No. 20-72426 Agency Nos. Petitioner, A206-900-975 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 6, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: LEE, KOH, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Osman Enrique Mendoza, a native and citizen of Nicaragua, seeks

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal of an

Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“CAT”). Petitioner’s claims for relief are based on his fear of violence, on

account of his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.