Jose Zarate-Hernandez v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202618-70637California1,209 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE LUIS ZARATE-HERNANDEZ, No. 18-70637
Petitioner, Agency No. A087-777-668
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 6, 2026** Portland, Oregon
Before: BEA, CHRISTEN, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Jose Luis Zarate-Hernandez (“Zarate”) petitions for review of a
Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal of an
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications for cancellation of removal,
asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition.