Everildo Lopez Lopez v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202620-72131California798 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EVERILDO LOPEZ LOPEZ; RUDY No. 20-72131

ARMANDO LOPEZ CANO,

Agency Nos. Petitioners, A208-306-150 v. A208-306-151

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 6, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: LEE, KOH, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Everildo Lopez Lopez and his son, Rudy Armando Lopez Cano, (collectively,

“Petitioners”) are natives and citizens of Guatemala who petition for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of Petitioners’ appeal of an

Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of Petitioners’ application for asylum,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). withholding of removal,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.