Apodaca-Benitez
Apodaca-Benitez v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202623-217California977 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE ENRIQUE APODACA-BENITEZ, No. 23-217 Agency No. Petitioner, A202-014-735 v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 5, 2026** Phoenix, Arizona
Before: BERZON, CALLAHAN, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Jose Enrique Apodaca-Benitez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his
appeal from an order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying his application for
cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a). We deny
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the petition for review.