Apodaca-Benitez

Apodaca-Benitez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202623-217California977 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE ENRIQUE APODACA-BENITEZ, No. 23-217 Agency No. Petitioner, A202-014-735 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 5, 2026** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: BERZON, CALLAHAN, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Jose Enrique Apodaca-Benitez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his

appeal from an order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying his application for

cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a). We deny

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s findings of fact…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.