Bondi

Guzman Ramirez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202625-746California778 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALFREDO GUZMAN RAMIREZ, No. 25-746 Agency No. Petitioner, A089-270-000 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 6, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: LEE, KOH, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Alfredo Guzman Ramirez, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks review of a

decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an Immigration

Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of Guzman Ramirez’s application for cancellation of removal.

The BIA affirmed the IJ’s conclusion that Guzman Ramirez failed to show his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal would result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his

qualifying U.S. citizen…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.