Bahena-Barreto
Bahena-Barreto v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202624-4497California526 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NARCISO BAHENA-BARRETO, No. 24-4497 Agency No. Petitioner, A216-051-709 v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 6, 2026** Portland, Oregon
Before: BEA, CHRISTEN, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks review of a decision of the
Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) that dismissed his appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision, which denied his application for cancellation of
removal and ordered Petitioner removed to Mexico. We have jurisdiction under
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1252(a). We review the BIA’s legal determinations de novo. Umana-