Bahena-Barreto

Bahena-Barreto v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202624-4497California526 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NARCISO BAHENA-BARRETO, No. 24-4497 Agency No. Petitioner, A216-051-709 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 6, 2026** Portland, Oregon

Before: BEA, CHRISTEN, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks review of a decision of the

Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) that dismissed his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision, which denied his application for cancellation of

removal and ordered Petitioner removed to Mexico. We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1252(a). We review the BIA’s legal determinations de novo. Umana-

Escobar v. Garland, 69…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.