Bondi

Salgado Tampa v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202625-2186California713 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN SALGADO TAMPA, No. 25-2186 Agency No. Petitioner, A206-407-465 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 6, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: LEE, KOH, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Jose Salgado Tampa, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks review of a

decision from the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal of

an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for cancellation of removal.

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and deny the petition.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We have jurisdiction to review constitutional claims and questions of law

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.