Bondi

S. S. v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202624-2431California485 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

S. S., No. 24-2431 Agency No. Petitioner, A220-350-487 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 30, 2026**

Before: CLIFTON, BADE, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

S.S., a citizen of India, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We

have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition in part and dismiss it

in part.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion.

Perez-Portillo v. Garland, 56 F.4th 788, 792 (9th Cir. 2022). The BIA abuses its

discretion if its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.