Bondi

Vega Lopez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 202624-6380California698 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SANDRA BANESSA VEGA LOPEZ; No. 24-6380 BRAYAN DANILO VEGA-LOPEZ; Agency Nos.

MARLEN YOLANI MELGAR-VEGA, A245-317-263

A245-317-267

Petitioners,

A245-317-269

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 2, 2026** Portland, Oregon

Before: CHRISTEN, HURWITZ, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Sandra Vega Lopez and her two minor children petition for review of a

decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing their appeal from

an order of an Immigration Judge (IJ) denying their motion to reopen proceedings

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). that resulted in an in absentia order of removal. Because the parties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.