Ferrell

Amber Ferrell, et al. v. SnapCommerce Holdings, Inc., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20264:25-cv-03160California388 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AMBER FERRELL, et al., Case No. 25-cv-03160-JST

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED

v. MOTION TO STAY PENDING

APPEAL

SNAPCOMMERCE HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Re: ECF No. 38 11 Defendants.

12 On November 25, 2025, this Court issued an order denying the motion to compel arbitration filed by Defendants SnapCommerce Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Super.com and SnapMoney, Inc. d/b/a Super.com (together, “Super”). ECF No. 34. On December 16, 2025, Super filed a notice of appeal to the Ninth Circuit concerning that order. ECF No. 37. Before the Court is Super’s unopposed motion to stay proceedings pending its appeal. ECF No. 38. The Court will grant the motion.1 Super appealed pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act Section 16(a), which provides that “[a]n appeal may be taken from . . . an order . . . denying a petition under section 4 of this title to order arbitration to proceed.” ECF No. 37; 9 U.S.C. § 16(a). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.