Ved

Divyang Ved v. Global Fitness Ventures, LLC, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20264:25-cv-03286California1,923 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 DIVYANG VED, Case No. 25-cv-03286-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER FINDING LACK OF SUBJECT

MATTER JURISDICTION AND

v. DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO

DISMISS

GLOBAL FITNESS VENTURES, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 26, 38, 40

Defendants.

On August 13, 2025, the Court issued an order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 38. In that order, the Court noted that Plaintiff has invoked diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 in the operative complaint, Dkt. No. 25 (“SAC”), but diversity jurisdiction is not sufficiently supported by the allegations in the SAC. Specifically, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Global Fitness Ventures, LLC (“Global Fitness”), is a limited liability corporation, and that Defendant Spain Fitness Ventures, LP (“Spain Fitness”), is a limited partnership. As such, each of those Defendants is a citizen of every…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.