Nenita Calague v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 11, 202618-70874California656 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 11 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NENITA CALAGUE, No. 18-70874

Petitioner, Agency No. A200-247-138

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 9, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, M. SMITH, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Nenita Calague (“Petitioner”), a native and citizen of the Philippines,

petitions for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

dismissing her appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her request for

a continuance and her application for cancellation of removal. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition.

“Where, as here, the BIA cites…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.