Nenita Calague v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 11, 202618-70874California656 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 11 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NENITA CALAGUE, No. 18-70874
Petitioner, Agency No. A200-247-138
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 9, 2026** Pasadena, California
Before: WARDLAW, M. SMITH, and BADE, Circuit Judges.
Nenita Calague (“Petitioner”), a native and citizen of the Philippines,
petitions for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)
dismissing her appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her request for
a continuance and her application for cancellation of removal. We have
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition.
“Where, as here, the BIA cites…