Bondi

Mejia Mendoza v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 11, 202624-7621California962 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 11 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDELIA MEJIA MENDOZA; JOSE No. 24-7621 PAULINO GONZALEZ MEJIA; Agency Nos.

ALFONSO DANIEL GONZALEZ MEJIA; A246-574-353

MIA LINETTE GONZALEZ MEJIA, A246-574-354

A246-574-355

Petitioners,

A246-574-356

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 9, 2026** Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, PAEZ, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Edelia Mejia Mendoza (“Mejia Mendoza”), a native and citizen of Mexico,

seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of her

appeal of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision deeming her applications for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). relief…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.