Bondi

Martinez Hernandez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 11, 202625-1168California995 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 11 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IMELDA MARTINEZ HERNANDEZ, No. 25-1168 Agency No. Petitioner, A200-199-109 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 6, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: LEE, KOH, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Imelda Martinez Hernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks review of

a decision from the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing her appeal of

the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of her application for cancellation of removal.

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition for review.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Dkt. 27; Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). To qualify for a discretionary grant of cancellation of removal, an applicant

must…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.