Sundahl
Mark Sundahl v. Comerica Bank; Conduent State and Local Solutions, Inc. d/b/a Direct Express; Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK SUNDAHL, Case No.: 3:25-cv-01473-RBM-DDL
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION TO DISMISS
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
COMERICA BANK; CONDUENT
PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE
STATE AND LOCAL SOLUTIONS,
OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(B)(6) INC. d/b/a DIRECT EXPRESS and
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, [Doc. 2] Defendants. 18 Pending before the Court is Defendants Comerica Bank and Conduent State & Local Solutions, Inc.’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (“MTD”). (Doc. 2.) Plaintiff Mark Sundahl (“Plaintiff”) filed an Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Complaint (“Opposition”) (Doc. 4) and Defendants filed a Reply in Support of the Motion to Dismiss (“Reply”) (Doc. 7). The Court finds this matter suitable for determination without oral argument 26 …