Pitsick-Perez

Raymond Pitsick-Perez, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public v. Southwest Airlines Co.; and Does 1-100

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20263:25-cv-03000California2,475 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 25-cv-03000-DMS-BLM RAYMOND PITSICK-PEREZ, on behalf

of himself, all others similarly situated,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

and on behalf of the general public, MOTION TO REMAND Plaintiffs, 14 v. [ECF No. 8] 15 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO.; and DOES 1-100, Defendants. 18 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to remand this case to San Diego County Superior Court (“State Court”). (Mot., ECF No. 8.) Defendant filed a response in opposition, (Opp’n, ECF No. 13), and Defendant filed a reply. (Reply, ECF No. 15.) The matter is suitable for resolution without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). (ECF No. 16.) For the following reasons, the Court grants Plaintiff’s motion to remand. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff originally filed this action in State Court on August 1, 2025, (Notice of Removal,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.