Emerson Magana-Aguilar v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 12, 202617-72017California530 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 12 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EMERSON VLADIMIR MAGANA- No. 17-72017

AGUILAR,

Agency No. A206-889-256 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 10, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: OWENS, VANDYKE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges. Concurrence by Judge VANDYKE.

Emerson Vladimir Magana-Aguilar is a native and citizen of El Salvador.

He petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

affirming a decision of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying his application for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against

Torture (“CAT”). We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.