Patricia Parada-De Martinez v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 12, 202617-72828California477 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 12 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PATRICIA ABIGAIL PARADA-DE No. 17-72828

MARTINEZ; KATHERINE ABIGAIL

MARTINEZ-PARADA, Agency Nos. A206-776-604

A206-776-605

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 9, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and BLUMENFELD,*** District Judge.

Petitioners Patricia Abigail Parada-de Martinez and her daughter Katherine

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr., United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. Abigail Martinez-Parada petition for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.