Meilin Moncada-Ochoa v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 12, 202617-72854California537 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 12 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MEILIN ROSELLINI MONCADA- No. 17-72854

OCHOA; R.K.G.-M.,

Agency Nos. Petitioners, A206-720-216

A206-720-217

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 10, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: OWENS, VANDYKE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges. Concurrence by Judge VANDYKE.

Meilin Rosellini Moncada-Ochoa and her minor child are natives and

citizens of Honduras. They petition for review of a decision of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming without opinion an order of an

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying Moncada-Ochoa’s applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.