Jimenez-Tapia

Jimenez-Tapia v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 12, 202622-1015California528 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 12 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ISRAEL JIMENEZ-TAPIA, No. 20-72325 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-720-563 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

ISRAEL JIMENEZ-TAPIA, No. 22-1015 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-720-563 v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 10, 2026** Pasadena, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: SCHROEDER, WARDLAW, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Israel Jimenez-Tapia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

a 2020 decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal

from the denial of his application for cancellation of removal. He also…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.