Ivan Nicolas-Nicolas v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 12, 202620-71638California523 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 12 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
IVAN NICOLAS-NICOLAS, No. 20-71638
Petitioner, Agency No. A088-807-211
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 10, 2026** Pasadena, California
Before: OWENS, VANDYKE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Ivan Nicolas-Nicolas (“Nicolas”), a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions
for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal
of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying asylum, withholding of
removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). “Where
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the BIA writes its own decision, as it did here, we review the BIA’s decision,
except to…