Anderson

United States v. Anderson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 12, 202625-258California1,156 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 12 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-258 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:21-cr-00397-EMC-1 v. MEMORANDUM*

ALAN ANDERSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 7, 2026 San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD, NGUYEN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Alan Anderson appeals his sentence for two counts of wire fraud in violation

of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, and his restitution order. Anderson claims that the district

court erred in failing to rule on his factual objections at sentencing, that his 88-

month sentence was substantively unreasonable, and that the restitution order

improperly awarded restitution to individuals who were not “victims” under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.