Singh

Singh v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 12, 202625-2018California682 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 12 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AVTAR SINGH; SANDEEP KAUR; A. S.; No. 25-2018

V. S., Agency Nos.

A246-601-573

Petitioners, A246-601-574

A246-601-575

v.

A246-601-576

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 10, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD, FRIEDLAND, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Avtar Singh1 petitions for review of a decision of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal of the Immigration Judge’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Singh’s wife, Sandeep Kaur, and his two minor children, A.S. and V.S., are derivatives of his asylum claim. (“IJ”) denial of his applications for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.