Singh
Singh v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 12, 202625-2018California682 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 12 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
AVTAR SINGH; SANDEEP KAUR; A. S.; No. 25-2018
V. S., Agency Nos.
A246-601-573
Petitioners, A246-601-574
A246-601-575
v.
A246-601-576
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 10, 2026** San Francisco, California
Before: GOULD, FRIEDLAND, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Avtar Singh1 petitions for review of a decision of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal of the Immigration Judge’s
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Singh’s wife, Sandeep Kaur, and his two minor children, A.S. and V.S., are derivatives of his asylum claim. (“IJ”) denial of his applications for…