Jose Villalpando-Rosales v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 202617-71028California468 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 13 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE VILLALPANDO-ROSALES, AKA No.17-71028 Jose Armando Rosales, Agency No. A205-319-297 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 11, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER, WARDLAW, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Jose Villalpando-Rosales, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the

denial by an immigration judge (IJ) of his applications for asylum, withholding of

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.