Jose Villalpando-Rosales v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 202617-71028California468 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 13 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE VILLALPANDO-ROSALES, AKA No.17-71028 Jose Armando Rosales, Agency No. A205-319-297 Petitioner,
v. MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 11, 2026** Pasadena, California
Before: SCHROEDER, WARDLAW, and BADE, Circuit Judges.
Jose Villalpando-Rosales, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the
denial by an immigration judge (IJ) of his applications for asylum, withholding of
removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the…