Jenie Carranza-Sandoval v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 202616-73902California778 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 13 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JENIE CARRANZA-SANDOVAL, No. 16-73902

Petitioner, Agency No. A200-945-185

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 11, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER, WARDLAW, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Jenie Carranza-Sandoval, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for

review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying her

application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1. The BIA did not err in deeming Carranza-Sandoval’s application for

asylum untimely. During immigration proceedings,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.