Wang
Wang v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 202621-1162California803 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 13 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SHIYOU WANG; MING MA, No. 21-1162 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A205-995-819
A205-995-820
v.
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 11, 2026** Honolulu, Hawaii
Before: BYBEE, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Petitioners Shiyou Wang (principal) and Ming Ma (rider), natives and citizens
of China, seek review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision dismissing
an appeal from a decision by an Immigration Judge (IJ), which denied their
applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8…