Wang

Wang v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 202621-1162California803 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 13 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHIYOU WANG; MING MA, No. 21-1162 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A205-995-819

A205-995-820

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 11, 2026** Honolulu, Hawaii

Before: BYBEE, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Shiyou Wang (principal) and Ming Ma (rider), natives and citizens

of China, seek review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision dismissing

an appeal from a decision by an Immigration Judge (IJ), which denied their

applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.