Bondi

Colindrez Ortega v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 202623-3496California660 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 13 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VICTOR ELICEO COLINDREZ No. 23-3496 ORTEGA, Agency No.

A208-763-837

Petitioner,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted February 4, 2026 Phoenix, Arizona

Before: BERZON, CALLAHAN, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Victor Eliceo Colindrez Ortega (“Colindrez Ortega”) petitions for

review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying

Colindrez Ortega’s motion to reopen and reissue the BIA’s decision in the appeal

of his asylum, withholding, and Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) claims.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. A motion to reissue an

agency decision is treated as a motion to reopen. See Coyt v. Holder, 593 F.3d

902, 904 n.1 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.