Blanca Roque-Lopez v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 202617-72204California615 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 13 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BLANCA ROQUE-LOPEZ, No. 17-72204

Petitioner, Agency No. A096-181-789

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 11, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: TALLMAN, VANDYKE, and TUNG, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Blanca Roque-Lopez (“Roque-Lopez”), a native and citizen of El

Salvador, seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of

her appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her claims for

asylum, withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture (“CAT”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). protection. We have jurisdiction to review final orders of removal issued by the BIA

under 8 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.