Garcia-Castro

Garcia-Castro v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 202625-938California543 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 13 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KELVIN SAMUEL GARCIA-CASTRO; No. 25-938 DIANA MARBELY BLANDON- Agency Nos.

CHAVARRIA; K. G. G.-B., A220-246-794

A220-246-795

Petitioners,

A220-246-796

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 10, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER, WARDLAW, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Kelvin Samuel Garcia-Castro, Diana Marbely Blandon-Chavarria, and their

child—all natives and citizens of Nicaragua—petition for review of a decision by

the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying their motion to rescind and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). reissue its decision. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.