Lund
Lund v. Murphy
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 202624-7153California1,064 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 13 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ERIC LUND, No. 24-7153 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 5:21-cv-01083-JGB-DTB v. MEMORANDUM*
K. MURPHY; BRIAN DAVIS,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Jesus G. Bernal, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 5, 2026 Pasadena, California
Before: GRABER, BRESS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.
Eric Lund brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that Officer Keetha
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Murphy and Lieutenant Brian Davis violated Lund’s constitutional rights and
California’s Bane Act when they investigated Lund for conspiring to introduce a
controlled substance into prison and transferred him to administrative segregation.